RICO Liability and Cannabis: Understanding the Legal Risks for the Cannabis Industry

As the cannabis industry rapidly expands across the United States, a complex web of legal risks continues to shadow its growth. One of the most significant and often misunderstood threats comes from the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Although cannabis is legal for medical or recreational use in many states, it remains illegal under federal law. This dual legal status creates a dangerous overlap with RICO, opening cannabis businesses — even those fully compliant with state regulations — to potential civil lawsuits and significant financial liability.

Understanding how RICO applies to cannabis is critical for operators, investors, landlords, and ancillary businesses supporting the industry. This article will break down the connection between RICO and cannabis, real-world examples of how lawsuits have developed, and strategies businesses can use to mitigate their risks.

What Is the RICO Act?

Passed by Congress in 1970, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act was originally designed to combat organized crime syndicates like the Mafia. The law allows for both criminal prosecution and civil lawsuits against individuals or enterprises involved in a “pattern of racketeering activity.”

Racketeering activity covers a wide range of crimes, including:

Drug trafficking

Money laundering

Fraud

Bribery

Extortion

In order to trigger RICO liability, plaintiffs must prove:

An enterprise exists;

A pattern of racketeering activity has occurred;

A connection between the enterprise and the criminal acts.

Importantly, federal drug crimes, including the cultivation, distribution, or sale of cannabis, are recognized as “racketeering activities” under the statute.

Why Cannabis Businesses Are Vulnerable to RICO Claims

Despite cannabis being legal under various state laws, under federal law, cannabis remains classified as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act. This classification puts cannabis operations in direct violation of federal drug trafficking laws, even if they are operating legally according to state regulations.

Because engaging in federal drug crimes can serve as the “predicate acts” needed for a RICO claim, cannabis companies inadvertently meet a crucial element of RICO liability. This vulnerability extends beyond direct cannabis operators to:

Landlords leasing property to cannabis businesses,

Investors or lenders involved in cannabis operations,

Advertising companies promoting cannabis products,

Security or consulting firms serving cannabis clients.

In short, anyone knowingly supporting a cannabis business could potentially be swept into a RICO lawsuit.

Real-World RICO Cases Against Cannabis Operators

Over the past several years, civil RICO lawsuits have been filed against cannabis businesses by private citizens, often motivated by property concerns, competitive interests, or personal objections to cannabis operations.

Safe Streets Alliance v. Alternative Holistic Healing (Colorado, 2016)

One of the most widely cited cases involved a lawsuit by neighboring property owners against a licensed cannabis grower in Colorado. The plaintiffs argued that the grower’s operations:

Created strong odors that diminished their quality of life,

Lowered their property values,

Constituted a “criminal enterprise” under federal law.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit allowed the RICO claims to proceed, finding that the plaintiffs had alleged sufficient injury to property caused by a pattern of racketeering activity — namely, the federal drug offenses committed by the cannabis grower.

Although the case eventually settled out of court, it set a dangerous precedent: state-legal cannabis businesses can still be vulnerable to costly, time-consuming RICO litigation even when no criminal charges are filed.

How RICO Lawsuits Can Devastate Cannabis Businesses

RICO cases pose an extreme threat for several reasons:

Treble Damages: If a plaintiff wins, damages awarded under RICO are automatically tripled. A relatively minor claim for $100,000 in lost property value could balloon into a $300,000 judgment.

Attorney’s Fees: RICO allows successful plaintiffs to recover their legal fees, incentivizing lawsuits.

Reputational Damage: Even if a business wins or settles a RICO case, the negative publicity can hurt brand reputation, customer loyalty, and investor confidence.

Complex and Expensive Defense: Defending against RICO claims requires specialized legal expertise and can cost millions in legal fees alone.

Simply being sued under RICO, regardless of the outcome, can be financially devastating for small and mid-sized cannabis businesses.

Strategies for Minimizing RICO Exposure

Given these risks, cannabis businesses must proactively work to reduce their RICO exposure. Some key strategies include:

Strict Compliance With State and Local Laws

Cannabis businesses must maintain absolute compliance with every applicable state and local regulation. Proper licensing, zoning adherence, odor mitigation, and security measures should be thoroughly documented.

Careful Site Selection

Operators should avoid setting up cultivation or retail locations near residential neighborhoods or schools, which are more likely to generate complaints leading to lawsuits.

Strong Contracts and Indemnity Agreements

Landlords, investors, and ancillary service providers should negotiate contracts that include indemnification clauses and hold harmless provisions to protect themselves in the event of litigation.

Insurance Coverage

Where possible, businesses should seek insurance policies that cover legal defense costs associated with RICO-related claims, although availability is limited and expensive.

Public Relations and Community Engagement

Building positive relationships with surrounding communities can help reduce hostility and lower the likelihood of a neighbor initiating a civil RICO lawsuit.

The Future of Cannabis and RICO Liability

There is some hope on the horizon. As federal attitudes toward cannabis continue to evolve, the risk of RICO lawsuits may eventually diminish. Legislative efforts to de-schedule or reclassify cannabis under federal law would eliminate the primary predicate act that RICO claims rely upon.

However, until cannabis is fully legal at the federal level, RICO will remain a weapon that opponents of cannabis can — and will — continue to wield.

Awareness and Caution Are Essential

The cannabis industry has made remarkable strides in gaining mainstream acceptance and legitimacy. However, the federal-state legal conflict still exposes even the most responsible cannabis businesses to serious risks under the RICO Act.

Operators, investors, and service providers must remain vigilant, understanding that compliance with state law is not enough to protect against federal civil litigation. By taking proactive legal and operational measures, the industry can better safeguard itself while awaiting the broader reform needed to harmonize cannabis policy across the United States.

Work with a Cannabis Risk Manager!

Protect your business from legal challenges like RICO liability, compliance issues, and operational risks.
A specialized Cannabis Risk Manager can help you navigate the complex cannabis landscape safely and successfully.

Contact a Cannabis Risk Manager today and secure your future!