Virginia Governor Defends Sweeping Marijuana Bill Amendments, Saying Input From Leaders in Legal States Shows Importance of “Getting It Right the First Time”
The governor of Virginia is pushing back against mounting criticism over her proposed changes to legislation that would legalize recreational marijuana sales, arguing that her amendments are informed by conversations with leaders in states that already operate adult-use cannabis markets.
Abigail Spanberger (D) said in interviews with local media on Tuesday that governors from other states consistently emphasized caution and careful planning when implementing legalization frameworks.
“Across the board, the top priority that people continue to put forth is do it methodically—because you have to do it right the first time,” she said.
Spanberger added that her outreach included extensive discussions with officials who have already navigated the complexities of launching retail cannabis systems.
“I’ve spent a lot of time talking to governors and folks from other states about those who do have a legalized recreational cannabis market, retail market,” she said. “Every one of them said some version of, ‘Make sure you get it right the first time and don’t rush it because there will be things that come up.’”
However, neither the governor nor her office specified which states or officials contributed to those conversations.
Proposed Changes Including Delayed Sales, Higher Taxes and New Penalties Trigger Pushback From Lawmakers and Advocates
The governor’s remarks come a day after she introduced a series of amendments to the cannabis legalization bills—SB 542 and HB 642—that had already been approved by the General Assembly.
Among the most controversial proposals is a six-month delay to the start of legal sales, shifting the timeline from January 1, 2027, to July 1, 2027. The governor also seeks to raise the cannabis excise tax and impose stricter criminal penalties related to marijuana use and possession.
The changes have drawn criticism from both marijuana reform advocates and the very lawmakers who sponsored the legislation. Critics argue that the revised framework could limit access to the legal market and undermine equity goals.
In a joint response, bill sponsors said the governor’s proposal “creates a less accessible legal marketplace” and “represents a significant departure from the framework passed by the General Assembly, raising serious concerns about fairness, access and public safety.”
Governor Says Goal Is Clarity, Safety and a Clearly Defined Legal Market
Despite the backlash, Spanberger maintains that her amendments are intended to strengthen the rollout of legalization and avoid pitfalls experienced elsewhere.
“My goal is to make sure that there’s great clarity both in implementation and in the ending retail market that we end up with,” she said in an interview with a local TV outlet.
She also emphasized that legalization must come with clear boundaries.
“It’s about making very clear that while we have a legal recreational marijuana market, or we are moving towards a retail recreational marijuana market, that it’s still clear that there are certain things that continue to be illegal,” she said.
Key Differences Between Lawmakers’ Plan and Governor’s Amendments Highlight Tensions Over Access, Revenue and Enforcement
The legislation passed by lawmakers would allow adults to purchase up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana per transaction. Spanberger’s amendment would reduce that cap to 2 ounces.
Taxation is another area of divergence. While lawmakers approved a 6 percent excise tax alongside existing sales taxes and optional local levies, the governor proposes increasing the excise tax to 8 percent starting in 2029.
Revenue allocation also differs significantly. The legislature’s version directs funds toward programs such as early childhood education, public health and a cannabis equity reinvestment fund. Spanberger, however, wants all revenue placed into the state’s general fund, with broad earmarks for services including behavioral health, workforce development and community reinvestment.
Additional provisions in the bill include:
- Oversight of the industry by the Virginia Cannabis Control Authority
- Permission for delivery services
- THC limits of 10 milligrams per serving and 100 milligrams per package
- Mandatory labor peace agreements for cannabis businesses
However, the governor is also proposing stricter enforcement measures. These include making public marijuana use a criminal misdemeanor rather than a civil offense, increasing penalties for underage possession, and imposing severe penalties for large-scale illegal distribution.
She is also seeking to eliminate dedicated funding for cannabis equity programs—another point of contention among reform advocates.
Legislature Set to Reconsider Amendments as Debate Over Virginia’s Cannabis Future Intensifies
The Virginia General Assembly is scheduled to reconvene on April 22 to review and potentially act on the governor’s proposed changes.
In addition to the retail legalization bill, Spanberger has also suggested amendments to separate legislation aimed at providing resentencing relief for individuals with past marijuana convictions.
At the same time, she has signed other cannabis-related reforms into law this week, including measures designed to protect the parental rights of marijuana consumers and expand access to medical cannabis in hospital settings.
As lawmakers prepare to revisit the issue, the debate underscores broader tensions over how quickly and how equitably cannabis legalization should be implemented in Virginia.
OG source Download Article 
